Hi Experts,
The scenario is MTS scenario and there is no Customer specific production . The user has a created a delivery of material for sales order using 601 E movement type. After which a production Order is created and the material is kept in un-restricted stock .Since a delivery is already created for this material , now the material is available in Sales Order stock . Is this possible if a negative stock is allowed ?
In MD62 header screen we are selecting "w/o MRP" check box for entered forecast. So MRP doesn't consider forecast for planning. In this case FERT material is make-to-stock type. So if there is stock system confirms to the order else it create planned order in MRP.
Now per business if customer order is not within forecast (Example - Forecast is 10K for Jan-2016 and customer order is 15K then system shouldn't confirms it.
If customer order is part of forecast then it should check HALB stock. If HALB has enough stock then confirm otherwise not.
To me it doesn't make sense but just want to understand if anyone else has faced same kind of question.
Reply appreciated.
Hi Experts,
Please suggest me best solution for:
I am going to set TECO status through COHV with the selection parameter- Production plant,System Status (TECO exclude and DLV) and execute it but when i go to mass processing and execute with function- 220 Technically Complete then system is throwing an error "Order Type Excluded for Master Data Chk!!!" and try to click on this message system throw me out from Tx.
Why is it happening? Where we maintain master data exclusion for a production order type? What is the solution of this?
Thanks & Regards,
Vivek Bhojak
Hi Gurus,
One of my client is having below requirement in KANBAN.
Change of Production supply area , Bins, in existing control cycle without deleting the control cycle.
I havent worked in KANBAN before. So just wanted to know is this possible if yes how to achieve this is there any other way to achieve this?
Any help in this regards will be highly helpful.
Hi experts,
when you enter a PP-PI order over COR3 you can go to GoTo - Costs - Analysis.
Now I search for a TCode which will show me such a report for multiple PP-PI orders with the possibility to delect also for material within a time frame (e.g. 01.01.2015 - 30.01.2015).
Currently I think that there is no report like this.
Hopefully you have an idea without development.
MAny thanks in advance.
Best regards
Patrick
Dear Sir
please i need your support for below issue.
i have a problem we have a material xxxxxxxx with below characteristics :
Requirement type : LSF
strategy : 10
mrp type : PD
we created two PIRs version "00" one for current month requirements and another for future requirements as below :
but my problem that is no planned order created for Month 12 2015 upper version after run MRP as the below is MRP list only PIR appear and no planned orders but all planned orders created for all PIRs for the another version i tried to use Key processing NETCH and NEUPL .
Hi,
I'm using LSMW to create a basic routing i.e., a header material with 3 operations. Nothing more, I have attached the step wise screen shots for references.
Issues:
01. In Maintain Field Mapping and Conversion Rules i couldn't find much of the field like work center, std operation keys, std times etc.., Why ?
02. Pls go through the screen shots and guide me.
03. I used single Flat file method.
Thanks In Advance,
Dinesh V.
Dear Experts
My client having 5 different Product(FG) and 20 workcenters and he is doing the production any of these work centers to get the product. He is asking that i want to confirm the production by work center wise. Is it possible in Repetitive Manufacturing process Scenario.
We are in ECC 6.0 and still getting this error.!
Usually BOM has a +ve value and with shortage of that quanity , COGI shows up with a +ve value ( Mvt type: 261-Consumption).
In this case, the COGI is with a -ve value . ( I am not sure about the logic here).
What is the solution and business scenario where COGI could have a -ve Value.?
Hi gurus,
At the end the production, I need to keep my products in a location as quarantine, for a period of time that depends on the product, before going to quality storage for inspection.
I have found that resources in PP-PI-MD in APO But I'm working in ERP.
Any suggestions? Thanks
Hi All,
I want to untick backflush indicator from process order. But in this case material is already withdrawn through COGI. I booked 262 movement still it is not allowing me to untick backflush indicator.
Please suggest.
Thank you.
Regards,
Mayur
Hi Friends,
Just i wanted check the validate to date (DATUB) values for all line items of BOM at table level, however i check the couple of tables but i could not find the appropriate one.
could you please suggest.
Thanks & Regards,
Sunil.K
Dear Experts,
I have the following queries on production version:
1. If the check date of the production version is earlier (say 30.11.2015) than the valid from date of BOM (say 01.01.2016), then will the production version go for inconsistency.
2. We have a few production versions for which the Check date is earlier than the BOM “Valid
from” date, but the status is green. Can you please let us know the cause.
Thanks and regards,
Kaushik
Hi,
In the above execution i maintained two flat files one for BOM Header & another for BOM Line Item (TWO SOURCE STRUCTURES).
The problem is i'm have only one recording but two source structure (flat files) here how should i maintain structure relationship step.
Pls refer the screen shots and guide me...
In Last screen only one source structure is been picked.
Guide me.
Thanks With regards,
Dinesh V.
Hi Team,
MD04 shows Shipping Notification for Purchase order that is not shipped means only AB confirmation was done.
No Delivery document done and no changes in Items after AB confirmation.
My Client asking it should be Rcvdnt as it is having only AB Confirmation in MD04 report.
But still MD04 report showing MRP element as Shpgnt.
Please help us what would be the case why it is showing so.
Thanks and Regards
Amarjyoti
Dear Team,
We are using MTO-REM scenario. Planned order is generated after MRP Run as procurement type maintained was 'X". Now, only half of the quantity I want to produce in house and the remaining half I would like to outsource to one of my other plants or third party vendor. When I tried to convert the planned order using MD14 Tcode it shows the error as "Planned order XXXX cannot be converted". Googled but no exact solution found. Everything should be tracked as per sale order line item only.Please help or if any link can help which was already answered, please let me know. The screen shots of my planned order and error in MD14 provided in the attachment.
With Regards,
Rajiv.
In MD62 header screen we are selecting "w/o MRP" check box for entered forecast. So MRP doesn't consider forecast for planning. In this case FERT material is make-to-stock type. So if there is stock system confirms to the order else it create planned order in MRP.
Now per business if customer order is not within forecast (Example - Forecast is 10K for Jan-2016 and customer order is 15K then system shouldn't confirms it.
If customer order is part of forecast then it should check HALB stock. If HALB has enough stock then confirm otherwise not.
To me it doesn't make sense but just want to understand if anyone else has faced same kind of question.
Reply appreciated.
Dear all,
This is a report of schedule line agreement. And the problem is as follows. After running MRP schedule released for components, Schedule quantities are not being distributed through out month into weekly equal quantities. Instead they are being scheduled in first week only. What could be the possible reason for this? What possible configuration changes can be done to distribute the schedule over entire month in weekly basis?
Thanks,
Prasad Inamdar
In mass processing transaction- COHV, when I try to do the TECO for production orders. I get the prompt There are processing records and the order cannot be technically complete. In the prompt, when I select Yes- I get the information showing that the order has been successfully TECo'd. But when I select no option, I do not get any message logs or even errors. I think I should get an error message showing the technically complete process cannot be done. Can anyone throw some light as to why such issue be there.
Hi,
In an integrated environment [Planning is carried out in 3rd party tool, MRP is not executed in ECC, and CM25 is used for capacity leveling), the planned orders [generated in 3rd Party Planning tool] are sent to SAP for ensuring a sequenced dispatching of planned orders.
We then use CM25 to dispatch the orders in accordance to the sequence generated in the 3rd party planning system. [During this dispatch, we dispatch planned orders to the Dispatched Pool]. Post dispatching, the user can potentially re-schedule orders based on alerts, priority, safety stock violations etc. After validating that there are no issues / errors / alerts, the user would like to then convert these planned orders to process orders in the newly defined sequence.
However, when we try to convert the planned order to a process order, we find that the orders are de-allocated back to the Order Pool. We are unable to re-dispatch the orders (converted) because the sequence numbers would not be valid due to re-scheduling of orders in the Dispatched Pool.
We validated that there is no change to the existing dates or quantity, however I am unable to retain the dispatched status when we do the conversion from the planned order to a process order.
Anyone who can advise on the approach? I have checked at least three different threads on this topic but have been largely unsuccessful to understand how to ensure conversion of orders (COR7) without de-allocating the orders.
Your views / recommendations please... !