hi,
can any one give me the complete flow with transaction code for rework process manualy,and also by using trigger points
regards,
saravana
↧
rework
↧
Scrap calculation in Production order
Hi
I have scenario for fixed lot size of 100 and assembly scrap of 200 %.
When i create production order with quantity 100 then scrap amount is not added in production order quantity, it remains 100 only.
But when i do goods receipt then delivered quantity in order becomes 200
Please could explain reason for this.
↧
↧
Lot sizing procedure for Make-to-Order
When we are planning a material on an individual stock, such as a sales order stock or a WBS stock, this material is planned on a separate stock segment.
In this case, the existing replenishment elements and the plant stock are not considered by MRP to cover the requirements under this individual stock and new planned orders are created by MRP to cover those requirements.
By default, MRP will consider the standard lot-for-lot logic (similar to lot sizing procedure EX) and it will create replenishment elements to cover exactly the shortage quantity. This standard logic for individual planning was developed, in order to avoid a leftover stock under the individual segment, as it would need an additional goods movement to transfer this leftover from the individual stock to the plant stock.
Considering the example below, where a fixed lot sizing procedure (FX) of 10 was defined for the material. On the Stock/Requirements List (transaction MD04), we can clearly see that MRP created planned orders of 10 EA to cover the Planned Independent Requirements, respecting the lot sizing constraints.
However, for a sales order under the individual sales order stock, a single order planned order of 30 EA was created to cover the sales order requirement, which means that the fixed lot sizing procedure was not considered.
Under specific circumstances, we want to use a different lot sizing procedure under the individual stock, such as a fixed lot sizing procedure or a rounding value for example. In this case, there is a setting on the lot sizing procedure customizing which allows us to choose which logic we want to use under the individual stock segments.
The mentioned customizing can be found in transaction OMI4, as we can see in the image below:
The options available for this customizing setting allow us to simply consider the rounding or to use the same lot sizing procedure used in the Short-Term Horizon.
Now, let's see what happens on the same example if we create a new lot sizing procedure, as a copy of the standard lot sizing procedure FX. Here, we will change the value of the field Lot Size: MtO to 2 - 'Lot size as in short-term period' and set this lot sizing procedure for the same material used on the previous example.
Here, we will observe that the same logic used to calculate the quantity of the planned orders created to cover the PIRs was used for the planned orders created under the individual stock. That means, the fixed lot size of 10 was considered under the individual stock.
Besides a sales order individual stock, the same setting is also valid for a project or WBS individual stock.
↧
cv02n- document status is not editable
Dear experts, configured document status like approver1, approver2, approver3 and approver4 for particular document type. in cv02n i can change status form approver1 to approver2 after sending the desktop file to content repository.. but when i am trying to change from approver2 to approver3, observed that the document status field is grade out- not editable. please advise where should i change the config. also tried with different users, but for others also, the document status field is showing as grade-out. please suggest.
↧
how to do sub contract process in operation wise
Hai,
Acually i was search more to get the solution for this, but still i cannot able to find the solution
I can explain the query with example
BOM i Created Like this
FERT -------- MMR --------- x_______z (MMR - Number )
Operation 10 ( In-house)
Operation 20 ( F - Sub Con )
Operation 30 ( In-house)
Operation 40 ( In-house)
Operation 50 ( In-house)
ROH 1 -----------MMR ------------XY________Z (MMR - Number )
Acutally I Create Part number for FERT and ROH were as all operation only have the discreption, now I need to send operation 20 For Out Sourcing
I was search in SCN and Start move forward
General Explaination :
* In routing i maintain PP02 and I maintain Pur Info Record
* And I Run the MRP and Release the order Then i can able to see the Pur Req (operation - 20) where I made control key has PP02 in Routing
* For GI to Sub Con i need Operation 30 But physically there is no stock because i not create MMR for that
* Next I Convert PR to PO (In PO contain only discreption only)
* If I Do MIGO stock will not add in inventory because in po only have discreption
SNC Methodology :
* So I search in SCN and they give the solution like Create Dummy Material and add It In Po component allocation So you can found the stock in invertory, Then if you confirm the operation it get consume in that inventory
Client Suggestion :
* But My client not accepting this method, because he feel it is more complex and some what difficulty
* So Please Give some other suggestion to resole this issue
↧
↧
PP- Confirmation required in control key
If we choose "Confirmation Required" in control key, then a confirmation has to be done at that operation. is this true for a milestone confirmation also? (i.e) is a confirmation mandatory for an operation with milestone confirmation.
Also is there a sequence to be followed the way a "required confirmation" and "Mile stone confirmation" should appear in routing with multiple operations.,say op# 10,20 30 ,40 &50. ?
↧
SO Not consuming PIR in strategy 40
Dear Experts
We are using strategy 40 . Where SO Not consuming PIR. We maintained following settings .Plz suggest where is wrong ?
PIR =100, Stock from PIR - 40, Pending =60
SO Raised =70
Individula/ collective Req = 2
Cutomer Req type =KSV
PI Requirement Type = VSF
MRP 3 VIEW
OPPS
OVZI
↧
Message no. VBDRV005
While creating receiving condition records in DVR1 for batch derivation I am getting following error " Message no. VBDRV005" - error found in the selection rule for attribute carbon_content.All configuration made successfully.What could be the possible reason for this error??! more doubt I have,the class with characteristics has to be assigned only in sender or both sender and receiver classification view?I have assigned to both.
↧
how to do subcontracting in operation wise
hai,
If this is my case what to do
Last Four days I am trying to resolve this issue
Example :
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FERT - MMR - 123456 i created
operation 1
operation 2
---------------
Operation 10
ROH - MMR - 012102010 i created
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
See now I need to do out sourcing operation 2 but in my case all operation have only description instead of Part number ( MMR )
In Routing I maintain PP02 and I maintain purchase info Record.
After I confirm the production order the will system creating PR for operation 2 Now with this PR number I will convert PR to PO . But will doing GR with MIGO obviously only description of operation is there.
It means that it will not add the stock in physical inventory.
As per SCN help I create Dummy Material and assigned it in PO Component allocation
so Inventory get added
But my client is not accepting this process, because he have more than 580 FERT component. it means that he wont create dummy material for all 580 component
Please give me some other alternative method
↧
↧
coois
Hello Team ,
My customer facing issue that getting dump when open order in COOIS .
can you provide suggestion to overcome this.
Thank you in advance
↧
Production Order Settlement
Dear PP Consultants
Greetings from my side.
I am stuck in the following scenario:
There is a production order with start and finish date in Period 2.
When we try to settle the particular Production Order using T. Code KO88, with Settlement Period and Posting Period as 2, the system does not settle fully but gives "Inappropriate Status".
But, when we settle the same Production Order with Settlement and Posting Period as 3, the Order gets settled perfectly.
Please guide me for the exact issue. Both MM and FI periods are open for 2 as well.
Looking forward for your earnest reply.
Regards
Abhishek
↧
MRP in collective order
Hi All ,
1. In collective order for child order ( SFG) , MRP is not considering stock produced from another manual order.
How to achieve this ?
2. Sale order should trigger Collective order - Which Strategy should be used for this?
Regards
Prem
↧
The worklist is empty for these selection options in Backflush
When running the backflush, we receive this error : The worklist is empty for these selection options. Any inputs please? Thanks in advance,.
↧
↧
Mass Update to Requirements
I am doing a Mass BOM Update (CS20) to remove an item from our BOM's, however, I now need to see if there is a way to do a Mass Requirement update. We no longer want to drive demand for this part on our system. I know I can go to each Work Order and update the requirements but I have 100's that need to be updated. Is this possible? Thanks.
↧
confirmation
Hello consultants,
While i am doing confirmation for an order i am getting the following message & unable to do confirmation.
Internal: FCO_CREATE_DOCUMENT
Message no. CO888
Pl suggest how to overcome this:
Thanks & Regards,
Venkat.
↧
Forecast against a WBS
Hi
I am putting demand (forecast) in MD61 for a material. I want this forecast to be consumed when I put a requirement for that material in CJ20N under a WBS. I don't want forecast in MD61 to get consumed when goods issue is done against the requirement in CJ20N. What config should I do to achieve this.
↧
GR MIGO not possible for WIP Batch
Hi Gurus,
we use WIP batches for subcontracting. We are in the process step to receive back the processed material from the vendor. We are trying to perform a GR against the purchase order in MIGO (Movement types 101 and 543, see screenshots). The wip batch is currently in the vendor stock ("stock provided to the vendor"), so the GR should move the wip batch back to "blocked stock".
When we try to post the GR, we receive an error popup by the system and the booking is not possible.
We also tried posting the GR with CO11n, but we get an COGI entry for the consumption of the wip batch from vendor stock (movement failed).
The long text says:
Combination of movement type/special stock/stock type is not possible
Message No. M7361
Diagnosis
The combination of movement type, special stock, and stock type (or batch status) is not defined. You may be trying to post stock to a stock type that is not defined for this stock (for example, blocked stock of material to be provided to vendor or returns blocked stock for sales order stock do not exist in the SAP System).
Procedure
If you have entered this data yourself, correct it.
If the system automatically determined the data (for example, if it tried to post the stock to QI stock because of a quality inspection check), inform your system administrator.
Procedure for System Administration
The entry MAO3 3 is missing from table T156M (quantity posting string).
Do not enter it yourself. It is a system table.
If the user did not enter the data manually, you have to find out how this combination resulted. When posting a goods movement via the MB_CREATE_GOODS_MOVEMENT function module or the method GoodsMovement.CreateFromData, the person calling them up has to check whether the transferred combination of movement type/special stock/stock type (or batch status) is supported by the system.
Any ideas?
↧
↧
Basic Start Date and Scheduled Start Date on Production Orders
Hi,
I have created Prd Order and identify the cause for why when the order start date 06/14/2016 and with forward scheduling total Qty 1 or 2, then schedule the Order and check the dates its become 06/13/2016. It was happening total Qty 1 or 2 only,
If we give 3 or more dates are same like 06/14/2016 no change.
If we use Forward in Time Scheduling and do the same activities for Qty 1 or 2 the desired result after scheduling is achieved Basic Start Date and Scheduled Start Date.
Please advice this.
↧
Help with demand planning disaggregation
Hi experts,
Please I would like to ask for your help with an issue. Let me give you a brief description of the situation.
We are creating a planning version thru MC87 transaction.
We upload a file containing all the sales objetives to the planning version on a weekly format, and one file per Plant. (Its a customized program)
Then we copy the version (the last one created) to the active version A00 with transaction MC78.
Next we do a mass transfer to Demand Planning (via customized program) or we do it individualy with MC90 transaction
As a result of the process I can se in MD04 the demand LSF for the entire year on weekly requirements as we loaded.
The issue is that the users in Production want to see the requirements and the corresponding planned orders on a daily basis, but the Sales Dept. can only prepare and load the objetives on a weekly format.
I can do a disaggregation of the demand individually vía MD62, but we manage a lot of products and thats not viable solution.
Please if someone could help me with a tip on where I should start looking or how we can do a mass disaggregation of all of our products or please give some advices to the entire flow.
Thanks for your attention.
↧
BOM item massive update on flag Relevancy to Costing
Hi,
due to a mistake in data loading from external PLM system
I need to massive update alla BOM item belonging to a plant
setting flag Cost Relevancy to X where empty.
Can you help me suggesting how to complete the task ?
Please choose the more quick and easy way to operate.
Thank you very much in advance to everybody will help.
Silvia
↧