Quantcast
Channel: SCN : All Content - SAP ERP Manufacturing - Production Planning (SAP PP)
Viewing all 1791 articles
Browse latest View live

Consignment stock in production order

$
0
0

Hi

 

Iam using one material which will be issued from vendor consignmnet

 

I have done following settings

 

Assigned stock determination rule in MM02 for component in  Plant stor 2 for sloc

Component is having special proc key 10 and consignment info record is maintained for purch org

Component material is having backflush indicator

In ospx  entries are available

In OPJ2 assigned rule for plant  / order type for backflush



In CO11n after doing stock determination consignment stock is displayed.


My question is, iam not getting special stock indicator 3 in production order component overview.





Automatic goods receipt for co-products during order confirmation

$
0
0

In the older ERP releases, the automatic goods receipt for co-products was not possible for production or process orders. It means that the goods receipt of an order with co-products should be posted manually, which used to generate more manual work and time spent during a confirmation, since an additional transaction should be executed.

 

However, as of SAP Enhancement Package 6, the automatic goods receipt of a co-product is possible for production and process orders. This functionality must be activated with the business function LOG_PP_CI_1 - Improvements in Manufacturing and it can be very easily implemented. You can find more details about this business function in the following link of SAP Help:

 

Improvements in Manufacturing - Logistics - SAP Library

 

After the activation of the business function, the goods receipt of the co-product can be automatically proposed during the order confirmation on transactions such as CO11N (production orders) or COR6N (process orders).

 

We also need to define in customizing for which order types the goods receipt of a co-product will be proposed when posting a confirmation on the order type confirmation parameters customizing (transaction OPK4N).

 

co-product 1.PNG

 

The problem is that the the goods receipt quantity is not proposed during the confirmation for the finished product and for the co-product, as we can see on the picture below:

 

co11n.PNG

 

The system behavior, however, can be changed, as of the implementation of the following note:

 

2201192 - Automatic goods receipt for co-products: Quantity proposal

 

After the implementation of this note, we can control if the quantity will be proposed or note using the settings for the message type C6 042. The note long text provides the following explanation about the system behavior after implementations of the code corrections:

 

To activate the quantity proposal, you must define the message type of the new message C6 042 in Customizing ("Define Attributes of System Messages"). To do so, use transaction OPJB or transaction O04C. If no entry exists in the system for the message C6 042, choose "New Entries" and add a new entry with version 00000000 (eight zeros), application area C2, and message number 042. You can set the message category in the "Cat" field. If you set the option "No message" here, the system proposes the quantities for the goods receipt of the co-products proportionally to the goods receipt quantity of the header material. If you set the message category to "W" (warning) or "E" (error message), the system proposes the quantities in accordance with the system design (no quantities for production orders, same quantities for process orders).

 

If we want to have the co-product goods receipt quantity proposed according to the header material quantity, the settings for the message type should look like the following picture:

message.PNG

 

After making this change for the message type, the quantity will be proposed by the confirmation, as we can see below:

co11n2.PNG

CM21/CM25 Dispatching While Honoring Capacity

$
0
0

Hello,

 

We have been experimenting with the CM21/CM25 screens and have run into a road block.      In a situation when there is more demand than the available capacity - we are unable to get the system to recognize the capacity constraints and move the remaining work to the following day so that it is completed. 

 

As it stands today, the hours are scheduled on the proper work center - though we are using finite scheduling, but when the orders are dispatched, it ignores avaiable capacity and over schedules the capacity for more than it is capable of handling in one day.

 

We have tried several different strategies and profiles, yet nothing seems to give us what we are looking for.

 

We don't have the APO module, nor have the SCN module as well.

 

We are trying to accomplish this via Standard SAP if possible.

 

 

We have properly setup the work center to allow 23 hours of work per day.

 

The closest we have gotten is dispatching a schedule that spreads the hours out too thin without maximizing capacity.    If the workcenter is available 23 hours/day - and there is more work scheduled than available - we desire the dispatching to fill as many of those 23 hours as possible and move the remaining hours to the next day when necessary.

 

 

Thus far we have not been successful.

 

 

Please advise any strategies we may employ.

Production Order Change - New Batch Determination

$
0
0

Dear All,

 

I have been facing doubts regarding production order change and new batch determination.

 

Initial production order is created(CO01) and released having all qty of components automatically assigned to batches based on search and sort procedures(SPRO > LOGISTICS GENERAL > BATCH MANAGEMENT > ...).

Due to some circumstances, production planner has to change original qty of production order(CO02). Hence original qty of components is increased/decreased and presented on additional line above but w/o batch number assigned. Is it a commom behavior? Do I need to assign a new batch manually?

 

I'd appreciate any advise.

 

Robson

Detailed scheduling view in planned order

$
0
0

Hi Experts,

 

In repetitive manufacturing process our client has created few planned orders manually as shown in the below screen shot 1235.jpg

 

But someone of other user has performed performed the detailed scheduling by clicking push button. After that the planned order has changed as shown in the below screen shot

1236.jpg

 

Now our client asked to remove the detailed scheduling tab from the planned order .

 

Is there any possibilities to remove that tab


thanks in advance


Regards

BLESSING

COGI- Post processing records (REM) history of deleted records

$
0
0

How can we know and see the history of deleted COGI records in the system. Any log and/or table that stores it.?

I see in forums that AFFWPRO (Table ) is not useful!

Prevent Process Order Changes via COR2 in certain cases

$
0
0

Hello there,

is there a way how to prevent process order changes (via COR2) with standard customizing after order had been downloaded to shop-floor control system?

 

What I was checking was to set the status LKD locked after order is transferred, but we still need to be able to post order confirmation, goods receipt, material consumption when order is being produced. With LKD, this cannot be done. And automatically de-set the status before each confirmation is posted from external system is not the best idea I think.

 

What was also checking was to solve this via authorization concept that eg. after the order is send to external system it gets an particular user status and this status is then being checked together with COR2 authorization so if the status is set, only particular users could change the order.

 

There is authorization key within user status customizing, and authorization object B_USERSTAT which can be checked, but this works only for scenario where the particular status can be set only by particular users with that particular authorization.

 

Is there any other way how to solve the requirement?

Many thanks for any ideas,

Kind regards,

Juraj

Problems with BAPI IBAPI_ALM_ORDER_TECO_RESET

$
0
0

Hello,

 

I have used bapi  IBAPI_ALM_ORDER_TECO_RESET together with BAPI_TRANSACTION_COMMIT to reverse status TECO of production orders. status change worked as expected. however fileds AFPO-DNREL and AUFK-IDAT2 where not cleared.

 

has anyone tried this? do I need to use any other Function Module?

 

Regards,

 

Angelos Charalambous


MD07/MD03

$
0
0

We have a lot of purchase requisitions that have beenraised for approval but have since been rejected.

These items are no longer pertinent.

However when we run MRP these items are appearing in the reports and affect the calculations for stock on hand/required.

How do I filter out these items that are no longer required?

Initial setup time after production

$
0
0

Hello all,

 

If I execute the scheduling for a work center it assumes the setup status of the product that it has just been produced. If it is the first product that is going through that work center I need to define an initial state that I understand provides with the relationship introduced on the setup matrix the start time of that work center.

 

I would want to know how I can achieve that the work center with a setup status assigned loses it so next time a product goes through it, the scheduling has to consider the setup time for the initial setup status again instead of considering the setup time for the last setup status that it had.

 

Thanks you all in advance.

 

Regards.

Independent requirement reorganization with allocated quantities

$
0
0

Dear all,

 

I am currently working on an issue on our forecasting process.

 

To introduce, just a few words on our process and system. Forecasts are currently produced by a third party system and then transmitted to ECC through an interface (using S076 SOP table). Each week-end, a jobs resets the forecasts in ECC, takes the forecasts from third party into S076 and then creates independent requirements from this S076 SOP table. MRP is run by purchasing team at least once a day, as sales team inputs a great number of sales orders on short notice.

 

In the process, to reset forecasts before the job, we use program RM60RR20 (which is the exact same thing like tcode MD74). Yet, when running the program, independent requirement which have an allocated quantity (i.e. have a sale order covering at least partially the independent requirement) are not set to zero but rather to the allocated quantity. Therefore, even if the third party system sends zero as forecast for this date, ECC still has an independent requirement.

 

This is usually no problem to us, as even if the requirement is here, MRP results are ok as the independent requirement is the same like the sales order.

 

However, it happens quite often that sales team deletes or reduce quantities in sales order. Whereas our forecasting process is weekly, purchasing team runs MRP at least once a day.

 

The result is:

- if a sales order is saved in the system the friday, for delivery next wednesday (for example, 100 packs)

- forecasting system computes a forecast of zero for wednesday during the week-end.

- ECC does not delete the previous independent requirement for wednesday, but rather reduces it at 100 packs.

- Monday morning, sales team cancels the sales order.

- Monday afternoon purchasing team runs MRP: the independent requirement of 100 packs is still here and taken into account by MRP, whereas forecasting system had computed a quantity of zero.

 

My question is: is there any way to set independent requirements quantities to zero even if there is an allocated quantity (i.e. a sale order) for each requirement?

 

Thanks for your insights!

 

Regards,

 

Pierre

automatic routing selection

$
0
0

Dear all , please gvie me a direction which is right:

&1  if  there are multiple routings matching the selection criteria,  the first one is selected by default(for automatic routing selection)...from SCN

&2  If several routings match the selection criteria equally well then all of them are displayed...from SAP help

i thought &2 is right , but i tested that &1 is right in my system. No production version using , the routings header information are the same except the 'valid from' date.

routing.png

Batch duplication in Production order during automatic Batch Determination

$
0
0

HI

 

We have activated Automatic batch determination on FIFO basis for production order.

 

Scenario 1

 

It is working fine. We are facing an issue when the component is repeated in production order with same quantity same batch is determined even though the batch doesn't contain required quantity.

 

Batch in production order.pngStock.png

 

Scenario 2

 

We created a production order and determined batch at component level again when we create production order and determine batch system is determining the batch which is previously processed in the early production order.

 

How to restrict if a batch quantity is determined for a production order and batch quantity is fully required for that production order it should not be determined in the other production order.

 

The stock for the batch is determined in first and the same batch is determined in the second production order too.

Kindly suggest method to restrict.

 

Regards

Prashanth CN

MD06:MRP List issue

$
0
0

Hello Gurus,

 

I have query related to MD06 list.

When we reach the variable print option on transaction MD06, system

will display the total number of exception messages of each group that

are triggered for a material. Therefore, when you try to apply a

filter, these are the values available for filtering. That means, you

cannot filter for a specific exception message, only for how many

exception of an exception group were triggered.

 

Is there any option available to extract the exception message specific data on MD06.

 

We are able to filter by highlighting the required exception messages but not able to extract these highlighted exception messages.

Can anyone knows how to extract this exception specific data from MD06.

 

Thanks & Regards,

Nitin

Sequence number in production order

$
0
0

Hello All,

 

Need your help related to the Sequence number field in production order under assignment tabIf i enter the sequence number in production order header level (for example 50000) the same number should populate in production order operation level so how could i do this.

 

Please find the attached screenshot for more details

 

Thanks in advance.

 

 

Thanks,

Vignesh


Subordinate order in collective order

$
0
0

Hi All,

 

Below is the situation:


In the production order printout, we need to print all operations of actual order (which we are printing), operations of superior order (in collective tree) and operations of subordinate order.

 

For e.g. collective order is like:

Collective order 'A' : Operation '0010' and operation '0020'

Collective order 'B' : Operation '0010' and operation '0020'

Collective order 'C' : Operation '0010' and operation '0020'

 

So, when printing the production order 'B', it should print like (in a column in print form):

 

A

      0010

      0020

B

      0010

      0020

C

      0010

      0020

 

Question:

 

The superior order of any order (in collective tree) can be fetched from table 'CAUFV' - 'MAUFNR', but I am not able to find the logic to fetch 'subordinate order' for any order (in collective tree).

 

Kindly let me know how I can fetch the subordinate order of any order in collective tree. ( We need to print only one superior order and one subordinate order).

 

Thanks in advance.

Regards,

Anuj

Testing of "Availability Check Control" OPJJ

$
0
0

Hi,

 

Our client asked us to is remove the checkmark for “Incl. Dependent Requirements” in configuration of "Availability Check Control" OPJJ( Availability Check +Checking Rule),

 

I had removed the configuration as requested by client.

 

I want to know the exact impact of this configuration change and i would like to do testing to know what has changed after removal of check mark for "Incl of Dependent Requirements".

 

Appreciate if any expert give me some suggestions/inputs to do testing of this config change.

 

Thanks in advance.

Status SETC disappears from production order

$
0
0

Hi expert,

 

I am confronted to a very strange behaviour of the system.

My client is using sometimes co-products in the BOM. At the production order creation, the settlement rule is created. So I have status SETC at the header.

But for some reason, when a change is made to the production order from the planning board, that status disappears, and order settlement can not be done.

I was not able to find out the nature of the change. All I could see was that in the Status Changes, the status disappeared due to the transaction Capacity Levelling.

Also, this happend to orders with co-product.

 

Can anyone help?

 

Thnks

Martin.

Open PO if Cost Center changes in Work Center

$
0
0

Hi We have to set a new Cost Center validity in some Work Centers. This is basically no Problem in CR02 with new Activity Types. Rates are also set up in KP26. What is with running Production Orders? The first tests I made with CO11n where going to COFC!? Reason for that is that for new Cost Center and old Activity Type no rate is available. Is there something else I have to do do we have to cloes all open Production OrdersHi We have to set a new Cost Center validity in some Work Centers. This is basically no Problem in CR02 with new Activity Types. Rates are also set up in KP26. What is with running Production Orders? The first tests I made with CO11n where going to COFC!? Reason for that is that for new Cost Center and old Activity Type no rate is available. Is there something else I have to do or do we have to close all open Production Orders? What I expect is that after validity start date confirmations are using the new settings in Work Center. Is this not the case or what do I have to do? With kind regards and thank you for your response!!! Peter

Planning strategy 40

$
0
0

Hi,

 

I am testing planning strategy 40 and here is the scenario

 

Avl Stock 200 GAL

PIR: 300 GAL

Sales Order: 600 GAL

 

When I ran the MRP the system proposed a planned order for 400 GAL and the entire PIR gets consumed by the sales order. I am trying to understand how it came up with the planned order qty and I was expecting a higher qty. The 400 will meet only the sales order req along with the existing stock so how about the PIR requirement?

 

Thanks

Sachin

Viewing all 1791 articles
Browse latest View live


<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>